Saturday, July 5, 2025

Undaunted, He Wrote.



Dr. Bukola Saraki's ascent to Senate President during the 8th National Assembly (2015–2019) was, essentially, a carefully planned civilian coup executed within the National Assembly against Chief Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Central to this plot was a deliberate attempt to weaken Chief Asiwaju and diminish his influence and relevance in the new administration he nurtured and helped bring to fruition.

A vital question remains: Where did the instruction originate that directed certain lawmakers to proceed to the National Assembly for the decisive vote? All evidence suggests it came from Aso Villa.

However, to this day, the identity of the person who issued or authorised that call remains unknown. Significantly, the senators excluded from this process or phone call were all members of the APC loyal to Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who were prepared to vote for his preferred candidate as the Senate President, instead of Dr. Saraki for the role.

This manoeuvre was part of a broader strategy to politically sideline Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu within the very government he helped install — President Buhari's administration.

One might have thought that, considering his enormous sacrifices that propelled Gen Buhari into the Presidency, President Buhari and his close-knit inner circle would have handed the APC Presidential ticket to him effortlessly. But no, they wanted him out, humiliated. Unfazed, he fought back. To this day, only God knows how he did it - defeating the presidential machinery with a single strike.

A similar crude scheming pattern re-emerged during the last PDP presidential primaries, leading to the controversial defeat of Governor Nyesom Wike. The Sokoto man he trusted the most pulled the rug from under him, resulting in a crash. Even though he rose from the fall, he seems not to have forgotten how he fell and those responsible.

These two fighters didn't resolve to nurse their wounds in seclusion, defeated; rather, they are actively disrupting the status quo, undeterred. They feel no moral lapses in taking the fight to their tormentors' comfort zones, simultaneously pulling all strings to reinvent the federal government for the good of our future generations.

And what could be worse than changing the national currency on the eve of presidential campaigning and election, then failing to make the currency available months after the change? As a result, many vulnerable Nigerians died in the process, while the targeted victim, overcoming all the odds, soldiered on to victory undaunted.

Today, for the first time in Nigeria’s political history, a pro-people administration occupies the centre stage. Yet, ironically, many seem reluctant to grant them even three full years in office. It prompts the question: When was the last time Nigerian universities completed two consecutive academic years without disruption?

Leadership should be assessed not only on past grievances but also on current intentions and future outcomes. Let us give Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu and his team a fair chance to deliver on their promises while remaining vigilant and committed to constructive engagement.

They are not merely governing within the limits of available human and material resources; they are pushing boundaries, reinventing resilience, and optimising the process.

A culture of low expectations does not define them. This is more than conventional governance. This is a complete reset, heralding not just the remaking of a broken system, but a total replacement.

Consequently, tough times can only be alleviated, but hardly eradicated, during a sudden disruption. Thus, being patient becomes unavoidable.

Barr Alex Ehi Aidaghese
July 03, 2025

Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Integrity: Standing for Nigeria When No One Is Watching

On May 17, 2013, I published an essay on my blog titled “Nigeria is at War: We Must Stand Up and Support Our President.” It came on the heels of President Goodluck Jonathan’s declaration of a State of Emergency in Adamawa, Yobe, and Borno States, a necessary but highly controversial decision at the time.

The backlash from certain corners of the country was swift and predictable. Northern political elites, the Arewa Consultative Forum, and the Northern Elders Forum all raised objections. Yet in that moment of national tension, silence wasn’t an option for me.

I believed the moment called for courage, clarity, and patriotic resolve. So, I sent the essay to several national newspapers and platforms, including Sahara Reporters. None of them published it.

Unwilling to be silenced or frustrated, I took an unconventional step: I submitted an abridged version as a comment under a Punch Newspaper story titled "North Kicks Against Ban on Boko Haram, Ansaru", signing it as Nonaligned ProgressiveBasement Blogger: North kicks against ban on B’Haram, Ansaru

That comment, unbelievably, struck a nerve.


A Voice That Resonated

The Punch comment section, usually a cauldron of divergent, often polarised opinions, came alive in an unprecedented manner. My submission received about 100 thumbs-up and more than 400 supportive comments. Not a single dissenting view was recorded. For two consecutive days, my comment sat atop the news feed, drawing attention from Nigerians across divides, at home and abroad.

Since the advent of social media in Nigeria’s public discourse, I have never seen such a unanimous endorsement of a piece, especially by Nigerians known for their fierce opinions, deep scepticism, and intellectual independence. Spiritually, I felt abundantly blessed. The prayers and goodwill messages I received during those two days remain unforgettable.

Something unexpected followed.


Silence from the Critics

After my piece was published, the usual stream of open criticism against President Jonathan’s counter-insurgency policies seemed to dry up. Some suggested the administration had placed a mole in the press. But there was no mole. I was simply a citizen standing up for the President when it was least fashionable. At the time, those around him failed to craft a compelling public defence of his actions.

In the essay, I concluded with this call to conscience:

“As Professor Wole Soyinka would say, ‘The man dies in all who keep silent in the face of tyranny.’ If the Borno occupation by the sect is not a tyranny, I wonder what is. Therefore, all of us must stand with the President and support our military in their collective commitment to liberate the supposedly free people of Southern Kaduna, Plateau, Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa States from the siege of the Boko Haram sect.”


The Response from the Ivory Tower

Given the reaction to my comment on Punch Newspaper, I anticipated some form of rebuttal, perhaps from academics or political thinkers in Northern Nigeria. That response came on June 10, 2013, in the form of a powerful speech delivered before the Student Council at Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, not by an academic, but by a well-known public figure, whom I’ll refer to here as Mr. X.

The speech quickly made headlines nationwide. In it, Mr. X lamented the state of Nigerian democracy:

“The tragedy of our democracy is that it is one in which the yearnings of the youth are stamped down to perpetuate a tyranny of interests. Tyranny it is when a certain slim range of people impose their private interests on the majority; tyranny it is when the agents of change are left on the cliffs of unemployment, poverty, insecurity, substandard education and, worse still, policies destroyed by our heritage of corruption.” 

“To democratize Nigeria, we must understand the powers we refuse to explore. The tyrants in a democracy are actually individuals from amongst the people, but when they become agents of electoral malpractices and political dishonesty, the dice turns up against the people from which they have come.” – Mr. X.

Reading Mr. X’s speech filled me with satisfaction. It affirmed my interpretation of the political currents in the country at that time. But someone missed the context completely—Dr. Reuben Abati, President Jonathan’s then Press Secretary.


A Misguided Rebuttal

Dr. Abati accused Mr. X of hypocrisy, labelling his critique as a betrayal and branding his comments as an attack on the President’s integrity. In his words:

“It is certainly the height of hypocrisy for Mr. X, who built his reputation as an anti-corruption crusader by trampling on the rule of law, to now accuse an administration that has upheld human rights and due process of being tyrannical.”

But here’s the problem: Mr. X never used the word “tyrannical” about the Jonathan administration. His speech critiqued the broader structure of Nigerian politics, not the President personally.

Seeing the growing misinterpretation, I responded with a commentary titled “X v. Abati: Fighting the Wrong War Over Deceptive Headlines”, which was published in the Punch Newspaper that carries the Abati story. In that piece, I clarified and defended Mr. X:

“Let it be on record that Mr X was the first, and, if I am not mistaken, the only prominent member of the opposition parties who came out to support the President and the Presidency following the declaration of a State of Emergency in Borno, Yobe, and Adamawa States. From all indications, it seems we have forgotten all that patriotic performance by Mr X., when standing with the President or supporting him then, especially by members of the opposition, was considered an aberration. Concerning the instant feud between Mr. X and Dr. Abati, I read the X's address before the Student Council at ABU several times, but I couldn't find the term "tyrannical leadership."

To reinforce my point, I reproduced all the references to “tyranny” in Mr. X’s speech, none of which accused the President or his administration.


A Commentary on Integrity and Public Dialogue

I concluded my piece with a message to Dr. Abati:

"... expecting Mr. X to be blindly subservient or steadfastly deferential to the Presidency on every issue is, to say the least, indefensible, conceited, and unreasonable. Finally, there are numerous ways to put a lie or to rebut treatises, without actually sounding antagonistic or condescending. If the ship is not sinking, then provide charts, facts, and figures to support your position that indeed, the ship is not sinking. Not a diatribe. I beg to move." Signed: Mr. Alex Aidaghese - Punch Newspaper, 6/10/2013

What I did not disclose to Nigerians at the time was that Mr. X’s speech at ABU was a response to my widely read Punch comment. It was a dialogue, an intellectual back-and-forth between two patriotic voices, trying to give meaning to a confusing and dangerous time in Nigeria’s history.


A Legacy in Print

I’ve never let grammatical missteps or editorial rejection discourage me. What matters is that I have a platform to present my thoughts to the world with accuracy and sincerity. My blog, hamiltonatlarge.blogspot.com, remains the most daring venture of my life, one that allows me to tell my truth, without waiting for an editor’s nod.

When I am gone, the world will have access to the thoughts of a man they often misunderstood, sometimes feared, but who always spoke from a place of conviction and vision. I’ve been criticised behind my back, rarely applauded in my absence, yet I remain undeterred.

My Motivation Was, and Still Is, Nigeria

What I did for President Jonathan during the Boko Haram crisis, I did not do out of political loyalty. I did it for Nigeria—for its unity, its peace, and its future.

Though politically progressive, I always saw Jonathan’s government as a continuation of the NPN playbook. Yet in that moment, he needed defence—not because he was perfect, but because he was right.

Between Mr. X and Dr. Abati, I leaned toward Mr. X. Not because I agreed with him on everything, but because he was honest, credible, and meant no harm.


A Final Word

If I am feared, it is not because I sow hatred, deceit, or antagonism. It is because I embody visionary, truth, and a standard of integrity that many find intimidating. I have lived a life of thought, conviction, and quiet influence. And when I leave this world, my words will remain —  clear, unbending, and purposeful.

Alex Aidaghese
June/10/2013

Mr. Bashir El-Rufai, a True Son of His Father

"Can't wait for this man to relocate back to Bourdillon. The North is ready."

Bashir El-Rufai

@BashirElRufai

19/06/2025


There is a saying: “Show me your friend, and I will tell you who you are.” That proverb carries weight, especially in Nigeria’s political landscape.

Initially, I was not a supporter of President Goodluck Jonathan. I couldn’t understand how a PhD holder, an academic, and a son of the Niger Delta could appear so passive and seemingly uninformed about Nigeria’s complex political machinery. I expected him to reform the PDP from within, lead a transformative government, be more socially engaged, and recruit patriotic intellectuals like Dr. Festus Iyayi of UNIBEN and Dr. Attahiru Jega (before he was appointed INEC Chairman) as key figures in his administration. But his governance seemed to follow the same tired pattern of business as usual.

My scepticism deepened when investigations revealed that the sons of both past and sitting PDP chairmen during his tenure were implicated in a massive petroleum subsidy fraud that siphoned off billions from the NNPC’s subsidy fund. I had every reason to be disappointed. However, my opinion began to shift over time.

One day, while browsing Facebook, I came across Malam Nasir El-Rufai’s page. I had long admired El-Rufai, especially for his work cleaning up Abuja as FCT Minister. That admiration ended abruptly. Reading the posts and comments on his page, particularly those targeting President Jonathan, was a turning point for me. I was appalled that someone who had held such a high office would allow his platform to become a hub of bile, hate, and vitriol directed at a sitting president.

Disgusted, I returned to my blog and edited the introduction to an essay I wrote, advocating for an alliance between Southern progressives and Northern mavericks to challenge the PDP. Though the main content remained, I had to rewrite the preamble. See https://hamiltonatlarge.blogspot.com/2012/03/game-change-uncertainties-of-snc-and.html?zx=b83eba38448ef1e7

Over the years, reading Bashir El-Rufai’s (Governor El-Rufai's son) social media posts has been deeply disconcerting. One begins to wonder if he is truly a Nigerian, or whether he has benefited from any formal education at all. Even more troubling is the tacit support his father appears to offer for his crass and divisive commentary. If Governor El-Rufai had disapproved, his son would likely have changed by now. This is not an ideologically driven resentment; it is purely tribal, class-based, and feudal-leaning hatred.

This is precisely what I try to explain to my friends and family when they question my support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Bashir El-Rufai is a true reflection of his father. The campaign against President Tinubu is not driven by love for the Almajiri population or the Talakawa of Nigeria, nor by a better track record of service to these groups. It is fueled by resentment over Tinubu's disruption of the status quo — a system that once allowed a few privileged individuals like the El-Rufais of Nigeria to monopolise federal power and resources with minimal accountability.

The painful loss of lives in Southern Kaduna during El-Rufai’s tenure as governor, his questionable actions during President Jonathan’s military campaign against Boko Haram (including his infamous “anyone who kills a Fulani has taken a loan ... ” remark), and his controversial trip to the Sahel to negotiate with armed herders — all point to a troubling legacy. One is forced to ask how such a man came to wield so much influence over Nigeria’s future. I pity Alhaji Atiku Abubakar if this is the kind of ally he must rely on.

Today, Nigeria is engulfed in internal strife, violence, and terror, partly the result of foreign mercenaries allegedly brought in to intimidate Jonathan out of contesting the presidential election results against General Buhari. Yet, President Jonathan chose to walk away with dignity. And now, where are we?

The North, which Bashir claimed is “ready to fight President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu,” is embroiled in self-inflicted turmoil. President Tinubu is now confronted with multiple crises: the Middle Belt is in flames, the South is simmering with secessionist tensions, and the very forces Bashir and his ilk once empowered are wreaking havoc on communities, highways, and farmlands across Nigeria.

Reading Bashir’s unhinged public statements helps one understand why these armed militants show no mercy to their victims. You can practically feel the horrendous extent of his hatred and heartlessness. No iota of civility or traces of decency in his utterances and commentaries. Don't you have shame, Bashir? Are there no elders in your household or community at all? Where is the educated man in you, brother?

Let it be made clear to you: the Nigeria where your dad reigned as an untouchable kingmaker is gone. This is more than President Tinubu’s 2027 re-election. It is about fundamentally transforming Nigeria into a true nation-state built on equality, accountability, and shared purpose. A Nigeria where unchecked privilege, inherited power, and entitlement no longer dictate who gets heard and who holds sway.

If the status quo has intensified the grievances expressed by individuals such as Sunday Igboho and Nnamdi Kanu, it is largely due to the prolonged influence of figures like Bashir El-Rufai, who have been granted platforms and unchecked authority to sow division, dictate public policy, and shape the direction of our political system detrimentally.

This must not be allowed to continue. Nigeria is a nation worth preserving, but certainly not through the divisive actions and explosive utterances associated with the El-Rufai clan.

In conclusion, rather than dedicating my efforts to advocating for secession or the dissolution of this great nation, I shall continue to focus on mitigating the adverse influence of individuals such as Mr. Bashir El-Rufai on our public policy and on preventing those who espouse similar views from occupying public office in Nigeria. Insha Allah, I am resolutely committed to overcoming this challenge. Above all, this is a matter of advancing good governance in opposition to destructive forces.

Undaunted, He Wrote.

Dr. Bukola Saraki's ascent to Senate President during the 8th National Assembly (2015–2019) was, essentially, a carefully planned civili...