Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Nigeria: A Progressive Option and Other Challenges

Introduction!


I am progressive and I subscribe to Awoism. I support free education at all levels and an affordable and quality healthcare system in every community and town in Nigeria. I also believe that the government's support of the poor and the needy in the form of a welfare package is necessary because of the circumstances of our birth. I hold these views in good faith, believing that we have the resources to implement them successfully throughout the country. Given the enormity of public funds reportedly embezzled and squandered on frivolous projects yearly by politicians and public office holders since the beginning of the second republic, I do not doubt in my mind that implementation of the programs wouldn't constitute any form of financial burden on us as a nation-state. Besides, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo and his fellow Action Groupers were able to implement similar programs in the First and Second republics in the old Western Region with a successful outcome. Even then, they never had the luxury of a steady supply of petrodollars of the magnitude that political leaders and civil servants have. The first step is to put in place a formidable framework for revenue drive and plugging leakages and loopholes in our treasury, starting with the abolition of the modern-day legalised fraud popularly referred to as the security vote.


In addition, ours is the only country in the developing world where someone could become a multimillionaire overnight, not necessarily on account of their rare business acumen, but from the illicit use of closeness to power or proceeds from lucrative oil blocs fraudulently and arbitrarily acquired during military governments. 


Without any doubt, a significant portion of our earnings from crude oil is under private control. Simply put, there is more money in private hands than reasonably prudent to fund our educational and healthcare programs at a level comparable to what obtains in developed countries. There is no denying the fact that the underfunding of our educational and healthcare sectors is traceable to the power game that is perfected by the ruling party at any given time. Which, of course, they do in collaboration with serving and retired Military Officers and their acolytes in and out of government. These groups do not have a problem travelling overseas for medical checkups. In a similar vein, they don't have difficulties paying for their kids to obtain a quality education from top universities in Europe and North America. Where else, but only in Nigeria, that a civil servant afford to sponsor his kids to top universities in the UK and North America, paying with cash? Something that American civil servants cannot do.


Searching For an Ideological Framework in Nigeria:


Today, no political party in Nigeria stands for anything ideologically defined. For a start, PDP, the ruling political party, does not stand for something that you and I can relate to. You cannot readily categorise any school of thought as a trademark of the party or the brain work of the leadership of the party. The same is true of other political parties in Nigeria. 


For instance, Papa Awo and UPN stood for Free Education at all levels. President Shehu Shagari and the NPN stood for Quality Education. Like it or not, the Republican Party in the U.S. espouses limited government and lower taxes. I stand to be corrected, PDP, ACN, Labour, and CPC, just name the political party in Nigeria, and none of them has any distinct ideological label or ascertainable political philosophy known to a man worthy of embrace. Be it in education, healthcare, or the real economy, to create more jobs and improve public welfare, it is always trial and error. Every successive administration defines its own "vision 20:20" or "new millennium" baloney. 


For eight years, President Obasanjo was ensconced in the comfort of Aso Rock, strategising on how to emasculate the opposing forces within and outside of his political party. He was more interested in how to prolong the duration of his presidency than in building a sustainable framework for economic expansion. 


While he was busy complicating affairs at the federal level, at the state and local government levels, and even in states controlled by his political party, it was unjust enrichment galore for all the Governors. Junketing to North America and Western Europe at regular intervals and buying exotic properties along the way became the custom rather than the exception within the Governor's class. 


And on a sad note, there was no national policy on healthcare or educational advancement. Those leading the different political parties hadn't the faintest idea why they were in politics or the race for power. 


For instance, what is the national policy on health care? None. That is what is still missing in our democratic process presently - motivations in power. They have no clue why they are in government, other than to feed fat on public funds that they never labour to generate. 


Thanks to the abundant supply of free money from crude oil. There is no discernible ideological framework or political philosophy, or leadership objectives to pursue to raise funds similar to what Papa Awo did concerning the funding of free education, or as President George Bush did on tax cuts for the rich. The motivations for power are the same throughout the country. It is either, it is my turn to serve or it is the turn of my tribe to present the next President or Governor. It is never what I have to offer or how my political party is better than the others.


The need to have a consistent public policy set goals cannot be overemphasised. It doesn't bode well for sustainable economic development and effectiveness in the public sector. Thus, making the game change politically inevitable and morally imperative at this point in our beloved country.


Game Change!


It is a known fact that the other political parties bungled an opportunity of a lifetime when they couldn't mobilise and rally around a common candidate or an electable candidate throughout the period the late President Yar'Adua was bedridden. They stood still while PDP battled itself out to overcome its zoning formula as if it were the only political party in Nigeria. Once bitten, twice shy. Critical time calls for critical measures. There is an imperative need, therefore, for an alternative political party to the PDP, both in terms of personality, policies, and programs, to emerge as soon as possible. And I am laying the groundwork for the formation of that brand new party starting from this moment and on this very Blog. 



Presently, PDP is creating a one-party state through the back door - the number of committees and study groups the President has so far created or is creating is more than necessary to serve the important government goals. Don't be fooled, this President is a chip off the old block. He is a PDP in flesh and blood - once a PDP, always a PDP. What is most troubling right now is that ACN and Labour do not have leadership with a commanding presence at the national level to match the political strength and influence of PDP heavyweights operating from behind the scenes. 


That said, progressives and Nigerians, in general, should realise that despite the systemic failure of the opposition at the national level and the systematic emasculation of the opposition parties at the national level, PDP can still be defeated at a general election. It is a question of time. 


The first step is to separate the wheat from the chaff within the progressive cycle. There are numerous political parties in our country today, without any distinctive manifestos. Each masquerades as a real alternative to the PDP, without any clear-cut objectives. Within these parties, you have pockets of real progressives labouring in vain to find a voice, while interlopers and career politicians hold sway and call the shots. 


For instance, the fact that you wear an Awo hat doesn't make you an Awoist or imbue you with Awo's values or his leadership virtues. Do you profess Awoism? Are you willing to apply his thoughts to the best of your ability, taking into account the volume of resources within your control? That is the test. It's all about pragmatism. The policy comes first before any consideration of how to procure the revenue. That is the test. Besides, you don’t have to be an Afenifere to wear the crown. After all, Professor Claude Ake, who introduced “Awo” as a course in his Faculty at the University of Calabar, was not in any shape or form a politician or of the Yoruba race. But he was simply an authentic witness to the accomplishment of the late sage and decided to propagate his message and what he stood for to the younger generations. Awoism shouldn't be about slogans and rhetoric, but action. And I will ensure its passage throughout the breadth and length of this country before I die. God is on my side. Awo meant well, and his dreams shall be fulfilled. 


In a similar vein, the fact that you exude Aminu Kano's populist activism image doesn't make you a lover of the talakawa or a talakawa sympathiser. Do you have what it takes to organise with righteous intent and with a purpose exclusively for the benefit of the underclass? Are you willing to practice social equality and egalitarianism? How many people have you liberated from poverty, decadence, and mental slavery? Are you willing to accept that there are people in your midst deserving of freedom and economic emancipation? Those are the tests.


Northern Intellectuals and the New Challenges!


A few days ago, I watched “America Welcomes Prime Minister Abubakar Balewa of Nigeria, July 1961: 25-28” posted on my blog at http://hamiltonatlarge.blogspot.com/, and I was struck by his command of the English Language as well as his verbal prowess. He was polished, distinguished, and in full command of the audience and the situation everywhere he went in the United States of America. The more I watch him, the more I yearn for more of him. And if I may add, I am disappointed, highly disappointed in light of the recent development in our socio-cultural scene. 


It is profoundly unbelievable that the same region that produced that icon is in a state of disarray right now. Yes, the same region that produced these eminent gentlemen and scholars - Ibrahim Tahir, Jubrin Aminu, Adamu Ciroma, Bala Usman, Abubakar Umar, Usuf Maitama Sule (the polemic), Gambari, Ibrahim Ayagi, Jega, Rufai, Babangida Aliyu, Ango Abdullahi, Adamu Baike, Justice Kutigi, Justice Bello and Justice Belgore, just to name a few- is now under a state of anomie. The region is under the spell of religious sects, unleashing mayhem on unprotected innocent Nigerians and foreigners under the cover of darkness. And we grieve in silence for the victims, without a name. If education is haram, the gentlemen listed above would have been a bunch of nincompoops. 


Surprisingly though, and of course, most disappointingly, contemporary northern intellectuals and the educated elite groups who are, no doubt, the direct beneficiaries of the feudal educational largess (full scholarship, lucrative, and strategic job placement in government and public sectors upon graduation) are now blaming the pervasive bombing the campaign by the Boko Haram sect on marginalization and poverty. 


More surprising is the fact that these privileged, educated elite groups suffer no equivocation when justifying Boko Haram's barbarism on every available space in social media.


Here is the dilemma: How do you make a change when those who ought to be at the forefront of change are the direct beneficiaries of the policies that made the call for change inevitable


This is not an abstract academic exercise - it is the fact on the ground in the north. And that is the first huddle that those of us who think change is possible must first overcome. 


Let me digress a bit: Southerners, without any doubt, resent feudalism and its inherent class system. Anyway, it is the same feudal system that made it possible for the overwhelming majority of the vocal mavericks of northern extraction to acquire the quality education they have acquired at home and abroad from first-level Universities. Sadly, these are the same people that southerner progressives like me want to align with to defeat feudalism. That is the dilemma. 


Here is my approach to the thesis.


In light of the current development in Nigeria, it is incumbent on the part of the vocal northern intellectuals to rebel against the oligarchic system in principle to collaborate with the progressives of the south to create a political culture that would benefit everyone equally. Given the scale of unrest in the north, rebelling against feudal philosophy that perpetuates class-system becomes a moral obligation in light of (1) the appalling discontent as well as the obscene disconnect between the nouveau riche and the talakawa, (2) the enormous wealth flowing to certain families in the north from lucrative oil blocs appropriated during the past military regimes, which is more than enough to develop the entire northern region, and (3) the unpredictable nature of the class the warfare that would engulf the region should status quo remain unchanged. Therefore, it is a choice: it is either you (Mavericks and militant intellectuals) step out of your protective closets and align with other progressives and help to build a sustainable human and economic development throughout the northern region and Nigeria at large, or you remain ensconced in your El Dorado and suffer the Qaddafi's foolhardiness in the long run. The ball is in your court. I rest my case.


A Progressive Approach to Sovereign National Conference and Leadership Change!


As things stand now, it is time for both divides (progressives and northern mavericks) to reach out across the Niger and the Benue for that elusive handshake and develop a new narrative for a nationwide progressive movement. Not just an alliance, to win the next Presidential election, but a coherent and virile, politically conscious movement, a grassroots-based political party for wresting power from the past generations represented by the PDP. 


The Progressives and the intellectual class, especially those living overseas, can no longer stand by and watch as the political situation at home deteriorates and step up later to blame the collapse on the usual suspects: greedy politicians, oligarchic feudal lords, greedy administrators and bankers and all the Halliburtons in our midst. No, it is time we step into any perceived void and fight for a new start.


Simply put, at this juncture, the issue is no longer about what Lord Lugard did or did not do, or whether amalgamation was a curse or a blessing, but on how to make the 'Geographical Expression' (apology to Papa Awo) live up to its promise. If there is no promise, create one. If there is no dream, create one from that which we fantasise and blog about daily.


Progressives and Nigerians, in general, should rest assured that Nigeria is not going anywhere and it is not for sale. And it will not go extinct in 2015. We cannot and we must not fail again.


You cannot talk about change without the wisdom to identify brilliant minds, courageous and well-grounded Nigerians imbued with the leadership traits and acumen to lead the change. Gentlemen like Dr. Kalu Idika Kalu, Nassir El'Rufai, and Dr. Olu Agunloye have the integrity and leadership wherewithal to bring Nigeria to par with emerging economies of the World. 


It takes enlightenment to know the enlightened, and leadership traits to discern leadership attributes in others. And I know about leadership. The main reason I settled for the three gentlemen mentioned in the above paragraph is.


As you brainstorm on your potential choice or choices, remember that no man is infallible. And as Jesus Christ would say: he who is without sin, cast the first stone! I hold this view specifically about the yet-to-be-proven allegation of fraudulent land grab by Mr. El-Rufai in favour of his family members while he was the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory. Until he is tried and convicted, let's avoid the call for his crucifixion on the pages of our newspaper. 


At this juncture, I would like to add that Wazobia or Federal Character did not play any role in my selection process. I was looking for (1) sound and verifiable academic and public service credentials, (2) familiarity with emerging global trends regarding international laws, technological innovations, and foreign investments (3) in-depth knowledge and understanding of the so-call "Nigeria Question", (4) audacity and creativity, (5) tested/preparedness, (6) flexibility and ability to confront unanticipated developments within and outside Nigeria, and (7) ability to lead, command, and inspire others. I implore you to pick your candidate or candidates, and then we will do a comparative analysis.


Thinking Aloud: 


Every Friday and every Sunday, we congregate in our places of worship, asking for God's Blessings. Why not? He is a forgiving God. Japan, the State of Israel, and Switzerland do not have what we have in terms of natural endowments. 


We are blessed, guys. Nigeria is blessed. Take a look at us: Kano (groundnuts, cotton, and textile); Ondo (cocoa); East (coal and merchants); Niger Delta (crude oil and gas); Benue and the Plateau (arable land for yam, rice, tomatoes, etc.); the Esan Tribe- my beloved Esan - arable land for yam, cassava, rubber, and Palm oil, just to name a few. What else can a given people possibly want from God or the Creator?



Right now, there is a consensus on what ails Nigeria as a country: endemic corruption, leadership crisis, trust deficit, insecurity, and Boko Haram. Most Nigerians do believe that the solution lies in solving our leadership problem first, and every other thing would fall into place. Others believe it is either the almighty SNC or nothing. But I beg to differ. I made my pitch based on the probability of the likely occurrence or happening of each of the options in our lifetime. If the probability of its happening now is unpredictable, because it is based on the happening of another set of facts not within the control of those making the demand, then it is a no-go area. If it is happening, independent of the control or influence of the power that be, I am for it. I will explain later.


SNC, endemic corruption, Boko Haram, and trust deficit are trademarks of a leadership crisis. It doesn't matter whether you have an Awo, a Balewa, or Zik at the head; the religious crisis is a never-ending problem, and the ability to curtail it is what makes the difference. That again is all about the leader that you have. Now you know where I am going.


Leadership Change or SNC?


Boko Haram is a chicken coming home to roost. A child growing up should have an opportunity to choose what to make of every religious doctrine. There are Muslims in Yorubaland; most of them are very educated, and some are fairly educated. The same is true of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Kuwait, Indonesia, and Iran, just to name a few. Why must northern Nigeria be any different? 


A compulsory and free elementary and secondary education would make a huge difference in the life of a child, especially in how he or she perceives religious doctrine and how it impacts their life subsequently. The situation on the ground in northern Nigeria is a testament. That again is a leadership issue. 


Education is a right. Religion is a choice. In the northern region, the reverse is the case - religion trumps education in terms of accessibility and importance. No matter how you look at it, it still comes down to the leadership that you have and what their views are on education and specifically, on egalitarianism. Therefore, the need for a new order concerning popular education for all children cannot be overemphasised.


On the issue of the Sovereign National Conference, I am yet to see an essay on the subject detailing why it is necessary and why it is the solution to our problems. The most disturbing aspect of the agitation for SNC is that those making the demands cannot give an intelligible outline of why they want SNC. It is all about what we want, SNC, without taking some steps to digress from your thought.


Here, I can only hazard some excuses. However, I do stand to be corrected. (1) Nigeria is not developing as expected because of the inclusion of the Hausas and the Fulanis in the union, (2) abuse of the Federal Character and Quota System by the Fulanis and the Hausa who dominate the political system, (3) the barbaric nature and the indiscriminate massacre associated with the religious crisis in the north, (4) the inordinate power ambition of the Hausa and the Fulani groups (5) the monopoly of the oil wealth by the same Hausa and Fulani groups, (6) the un-education of a greater majority northern children, and (7) the quality of leaders that the northern feudal or oligarchic class imposes on the rest of us at the national level. Now, ask yourself, are northerners responsible for all these, without you playing a part or some parts? 


Taking these seven facts as true, can you possibly develop a compelling case for disintegration or reasonable ground to convene an SNC out of them? If the answer is yes, who is going to convene or approve the conference? Is it the same President Goodluck Jonathan elected by Nigerians to serve the whole country for four years? Or is it the same members of the National Assembly revelling in obscene wealth right now at your expense? If the President and the National Assembly agree to approve an SNC, have you given any thought on how the delegates should be selected and who should be selected and by whom? If you are reading this piece right now, have you been to your village in the past ten years? Would the mandate of the delegates override the power of the National Assemblies to make laws for and on behalf of the Nigerian people? That is the dilemma. Implementation, Implementation, Implementation. 


Here again, I stand to be corrected, SNC is a long haul and it is full of uncertainties; therefore, we should not foreclose on other options. 


Granted, Progressives do not have control over convening SNC, but they do have control over how and when they want to start a progressive accord or a brand new political party. They don't need the Parliament or the Presidency for approval. 


That is my position, and that is why I am in favour of a concerted grass-roots political movement at the instance of the progressives and the economically dislocated Nigerians. The goal must be focused on rooting out those who debased and corrupted our political system, sold our girls to slavery, popularised kidnapping, turned religion into a weapon of war, and created an economic system that popularised undue influence, militancy, illiteracy, and oil bunkering. 


In addition, the massive scale of corruption in the country transcends race and geography. Also, the fragility of our sovereignty presently calls for a proactive approach that is timely, decisive, and certain. 


Above all, the realisation of the progressive movement is not contingent on the occurrence of a set of facts that are subject to an unfettered discretion given to a single individual - the President or the Legislators. In other words, a concerted political movement by the progressives is not subject to the discretionary approval of any individual or group of individuals, be it the President or the National Assembly. The Progressives are free to roll at any time. 


Moving Forward!


We cannot move forward or solve our problems by running away from them. The situation in the north requires a concerted approach from federal and state governments, traditional rulers, religious groups, and northern intellectuals, who are the major supporters of Boko Haram based on their postings and comments on social media. Adding to that, the political dominance of the Fulani and the Hausa groups is what it is because your fathers, Mothers, Uncles, Friends, and Kings and Queens are complicit. They know that you are unrepentantly greedy. They take advantage of it, buy your conscience with your own money, and corrupt the system more. That is our national disease that does not require consultation or dialogue, or an SNC to redress or address. First, you must change yourself. 


Concerning the abuse of Federal Character, Quota System, and the state of origin concept, a valid case could be made before the Constitutional Review Committee for a review and rectification, where appropriate, to prevent the elevation of mediocrity at the expense of excellence and credibility. The state of origin concept and its application in our recruitment and examination purposes is anathema to social and political integration. It does not take into account the physical elements and characteristics of a particular state. Every child should be able to answer the name of the state of his birth as his state of origin. These are some of the issues that the CRC needs to address. Again, we don't have to wait for SNC to address these issues when we have a progressive leader at the national level.


Indeed, the menace of Boko Haram is real, and the threat it poses to north-south cohesion is real. I am not oblivious to those facts. But Nigeria is greater than Boko Haram, greater than Boko Haram's sponsors, and greater than Boko Haram's intent and mission. We should not surrender to fear, nor retreat in our search for that Nigeria where equal rights and justice are not a mere illusion, but vested, inalienable, and achievable. 


I want to reiterate, those who made the call for disintegration, divisive narrative, SNC, and Boko Haram are possibly the enemies of true federalism, and they are the ones who must go. I am not in denial, as some bloggers would like to argue. No option should be taken off the table. SNC is but a part of many options.


At this juncture, it is my humble opinion that asking that we should delay or postpone solving pressing national problems until a Sovereign National Conference is convened borders on defeatism and weakness. It is analogous to the GOP's refusal to engage President Obama in finding lasting solutions to the lingering US unemployment and associated problems until President Obama is defeated. First, how do you know that President Obama is going to be defeated or that any Nigerian President and the National Assembly, for that matter, would convene a Sovereign National Conference in your lifetime? Second, what would you do in the interim? Do nothing and wait for the system to collapse or rectify itself? If you have a genuine case for SNC, start presenting it right away at meetings and conferences.


Conclusion:


As a culturally diverse and widely read quintessential global gentleman, I know what leadership entails and what it takes to build and stabilise a complex nation-state like Nigeria. I will be the last person to call for the dismantling of this country because I know in my heart that the problems that confront us are surmountable. I am very proud of my Nigerian roots, and no Boko Haram or 419ers can take that away from me. 


Americans fought a bloody civil war, and despite the defeat of the Confederate soldiers by the Union forces and the subsequent declaration of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 by President Abraham Lincoln, the Ku Klux Klan remained defiant in their systemic lynching of free blacks. The fact that the KKK refuses to see the light and embrace the inevitable change (emancipation) did not create mixed feelings in those Americans who fought gallantly for freedom, unification, and equal rights and justice for yesterday's slaves. So we should and must not allow the scourge of Boko Haram to divide us. 


Some see religion as part of living. One group can see reason with the views held by others and accommodate those views unconditionally, which makes the difference. Be that as it may, any attempt by anyone group to engage in forceful indoctrination of the unaffiliated should be treated the way it is - an act of war against the sovereign. It should never be interpreted as just another attack on innocent Nigerians. For Nigeria to live up to its promise of one nation and one destiny, it must be willing to apply every resource at its disposal to defend threatened rights.


Today, despite everything, America is the only God’s Own Country and the only Superpower still standing. I do not doubt in my mind that saving Nigeria requires enormous sacrifices on the part of every one of us. Nevertheless, we must remain optimistic, believing firmly that we shall and we are capable of surmounting every natural or manmade inhibition on our path to progress. Our goal for sustainable economic development, human protection of Human Rights, mental and psychological emancipation, and peaceful co-existence must consider vested rights.


Therefore, our desire for one cohesive entity, our love for the good life, respect for one another, intellectual and educational drive, freedom of worship, and the pursuit of happiness shall not be compromised. Never, never; we will never compromise on those things that we hold dear to our hearts. We will never bargain away our fundamental rights to associate and worship the way we want or bargain away our inherent rights to educate our kids in any part of Nigeria that we choose. Not now, not any time. We will never surrender.


That should be the new mantra - the goal and vision of the new order.


God Bless You and God Bless the Good People of Nigeria.


Mr. Alex Aidaghese

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Federalism, Presidential Succession, and Marginalization

Introduction

A federal system of government involves the delegation of power between the national government, the federating states, and local governments. Some of the fundamental elements of a federal system of government are the ability of the component states to manage their own resources, raise revenues, participate in the ratification of the national constitution, make laws, provide security, and regulate the general well-being of the citizens within their geographical and political boundaries.

A federal system is midway between a unitary system (where the central governments delegate power and authority to the states and local governments) and a confederal system (where the federating states are more powerful than the central government).

In a confederal arrangement or confederacy, the central government only exercises the power and authority reserved or delegated to it by the component states. In other words, the component states dominate the central governments and operate as semi-independent nation-states. Canada and Switzerland are some of the few countries where the Confederacy is presently in operation.  As a matter of fact, that was the model that people like the late Chief Olu Aboderin and the late Chief Bisi Onabanjo had wanted or suggested before they died.

The Nigerian Reality

Constitutionally, we have a federal system of government, but in reality, we operate a unitary system of government. Today, the component states in the federation cannot fend for themselves and cannot survive on their own without the monthly allocations from the central government.   The Thirty-Six States in the federation are like counties or local councils - a true replica of a unitary system of governments, where the centre is more powerful than the whole. That was never the intention of our Founding Fathers.

Federalism was at its best in Nigeria before the discovery of oil. Then, there was palm oil, rubber, timber (Iroko and Sapele Wood), cocoa, cotton, coal, and, last but not least, ground nuts. There was a Cocoa House at Ibadan, there was also the number one Television Station in Africa at Ibadan, an Olympic-size Stadium, the first of its kind in Africa, also at Ibadan, and the present Nigeria House in London, England; all acquired without oil and gas money. Groundnut pyramids in Kano were a spectacular scene to behold, and the textile industry was booming. Not anymore.

If we had a government and leaders that subscribe to accountability and transparency in the management of our human and natural resources, the unending demands for true federalism, confederal option, and Sovereign National Conference would have been over long ago.

In addition, if northern political leaders, yes, I repeat, if northern leaders and elder statesmen did not feign ignorance in the face of the barbarism and blatant killing of innocent souls and bombing of churches and public places by the Boko Haram sect, some Nigerians wouldn’t be calling for true federalism or disintegration in the magnitude it is presently.

Today, and as it has always been, military coups and politicking are the most lucrative professions in Nigeria. The reason for that is not far-fetched. There is easy money flowing from crude oil, too little to do with the money, and less accountability on the part of elected leaders. So long as oil money continues to flow, governors and council members will be less likely to embark on purposeful revenue drives from other sources within their respective states.

Therefore, achieving true federalism or a true federal system of governments in Nigeria without establishing a benchmark for alternative revenue sourcing by the states and local councils will remain a mere illusion. In other words, we will never experience true federalism in Nigeria as long as crude oil remains our major source of revenue.

Each unit must be positioned to manage its resources, people, and affairs and develop at its own pace without constituting a charge or undue burden on the central government and the other component states. But first, the central government must be relieved of its absolute control of crude oil deposits, which has become a curse. 

On President Jonathan’s Legitimacy

The truth is that the zoning formula adopted by the PDP during the primaries ceased to be of any legal or logical relevance once President Yar’Adua and Vice President Goodluck Jonathan ran, won, and were sworn in as President and Vice President, respectively. So, on the death of either the President or Vice President, it is the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that defines the succession process, not the zoning law or formula that was adopted by the PDP during the primaries. Nigeria is not a dictatorship, it is not a one-party state, and it is not an oligarchy. It is a multi-party State democracy. The complete absence of a strong opposition party at the national level notwithstanding.

Therefore, questioning the wisdom of President Jonathan in stepping into the vacuum created by the death of President Yar’ Yar'Adua is analogous to questioning our sovereignty, the legitimacy of our corporate existence, and our inherent rights to exist and function as an independent nation-state. The right to vote and be voted for, and the right to elect, re-elect, or un-elect anyone as President, is part of that inherent right guaranteed in the Constitution.

The Constitution is an embodiment of the supreme law of the land, and it trumps other laws, rules, and regulations, and they would be invalid to the extent they conflicted with the Constitution.

The argument that the President is not legitimate because he allegedly usurped the presidential position zoned to a particular region (north) is contemptible, vile, and despicable.  The accompanying violent and ongoing acts unquestionably constitute treasonable charges. If they are not checked, there is every likelihood that it could lead to anarchy, tribal warfare, ethnic cleansing, and the complete disintegration of Nigeria as a country.

In this trying time, Nigerians should realise that President Jonathan was elected by the people to serve for four years as provided for in our electoral law and constitution, and until he is voted out of office, we should let peace reign. Therefore, we must remain firm in our support for an unshaken and unbroken Nigeria and the Presidency. We must collectively reject any scheming orchestrated to imperil the momentum of this administration.

Failure is never an option; if the President is successful, we are better for it. If he fails while daring challenges, we all fail. He must, and he has to succeed as a leader and as a President. That must be our goal and prayer. We can no longer afford laxity in governance. Period. Therefore, opposition to his policies must be constructive and specifically tailored to (1) achieve a compelling national interest (progress, equal rights, justice, and security) and (2) check the excesses of the presidency to enable a governing process that is more transparent, efficient, and responsive. Calling the President unprintable names is not the best way to go, and it won't change anything.

On Poverty and Marginalisation of the North

Overcoming the intrigues (misinformation) of the elders and statesmen of the north, presently represented by the Arewa Consultative Forum group, is the first step to overcoming the much overhyped ‘national question' in Nigeria. The same people who monopolised our national government and our wealth for the benefit of their immediate family, friends and allies for decades are now blaming the incivility and religious intolerance in the north on marginalisation and poverty.

It is a known fact that these past leaders and statesmen did not contribute as reasonably possible, given the control they had over federal institutions, to enhance the values, standards of living, and educational advancement of the less-privileged and the talakawa of the north when they were in government.

Now, the main talking points are poverty, revenue allocation disparity, and marginalisation! Where is the marginalisation – you have the Vice President, Senate President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and a Governor of the Central Bank who commands absolute power, all from one region. With due respect to the Governor of the Central Bank, Mr. Sanusi Lamido, the West, or precisely, the Yoruba race, is best suited, as things are now politically, to raise the issue of marginalisation.  Mr Lamido should call on his elder statesmen to account for the time they spent in power at the federal level and tell northerners and Nigerians in general what they did with the federal might, the control of the treasury and educational funds. 

Professor (Senator) Jubril Aminu fought relentlessly and disdainfully against the implementation of free education at all levels in Nigeria for a selfish reason: It would only benefit the South. See http://yoruba.org/Magazine/Summer97/F5.html. He argued that northerners would not take advantage of the program, and it would widen the existing educational gap between the North and South. Sadly, he prevailed on the federal government to stay clear of free education at all levels nationally. They did, and that, my friends, is the national policy today.

Successive governments headed by northern political leaders did everything possible to undermine our education growth and advancement, knowing full well that they had the financial means to send their own children and the few privileged ones in the northern region abroad for Western education on a full scholarship. This is a statement of fact. So, what is "sentiment" or bigotry about it?

On the flip side, with the feudal educational policy now in full force nationwide, Southern parents laboured tooth and nail to send their children through higher institutions. Those who couldn't afford the exorbitant School fees mortgaged their parents’ homes and smuggled their way out of the country by any means possible. The then Bendel State was openly marginalised via abuse of the Federal Character and Quota System. Candidates were forced out of the Air Force and the Police Force recruitment lines because they were from Bendel State. It was almost obscene. 

Yes, Southern youths who were not successful with "Oluwole" or not fortunate enough to win the Almighty Green Card Lottery administered by the US Department of State (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) took to other jobs to survive our harsh reality in Nigeria. Similarly, in the US - from Boston to New York City and from Chicago to Dallas, there are thousands of Southern Nigerians with graduate degrees driving a Taxi or doing popular Nursing jobs to be able to pay bills and reach out to family members back home in Nigeria. It is a different world.

When I was growing up, there were only about four banks along Akpakpava Street in Benin City, Edo State. Today, almost every block on that same street has a thriving bank. That development is not the handiwork or a function of the investment initiative of any of the unproductive Governors, but from the massive flow of foreign cash repatriated into that city daily by the same young men and women who mortgaged their family homes in the 80s to be able to travel out of the Nigerian realities.   

In the Northern region, it is always about government - the control of the federal government and all the privileges and opportunities that come with it, contrary to the trends under Balewa and the Sadauna of Sokoto. Social awareness is not there anymore. An average Northerner does not know about "Oluwole", Green Card Lottery, or the feel of a Nigerian passport. Only in the North, you will find State Governors paying out wages every month to people who are simply hired or placed on the payroll to do nothing. 

Adding to that, poverty in the north, though deserving of attention, is not a recent development, either. The un-education of Northern children has been with us for ages. Each year, they squander their budgetary allocation for education because of the abysmally low enrollment

Again, what did Northern Governors and their Commissioners for Education do with the funds allocated to the Northern region for educational use? How many students have they graduated in the past 50 years?

This is an indictment on the part of Senator Jubril Aminu and all the Governors and Commissioners of Education in the northern region since amalgamation. Most importantly, it is an indictment of the feudal policy and class system that the northern ruling class cherishes but does not know how to overcome.

This is the time to look inward for a reasonably stable government. This is the time to ask the simple question: How did Governor Abubakar Rimi transform the educational system in Kano State during the Second Republic? How did Awo and his followers educate the entire student population in the Western Region tuition-free in the First Republic and the Second Republic? These are legitimate questions that present political leaders and Governors in the Northern Region and Southern Region as well need to answer, without delay and with solutions, too.

The emphasis on Sharia Law at the dawn of the Third Republic by Northern Governors was a misplaced judgment, ill-advised, and counter-productive. The Governor who introduced Sharia Law to Nigeria was the worst-performing Governor in the area of education in the history of Nigeria. 

Emphasis should have been on educational advancement and socio-economic empowerment. That is the only solution to the obscene wealth gap between the rich and the poor (talakawas) in the north. It is not religion. And certainly, not the gratuitous daily handouts or paying salaries to unproductive workers. 

Finally, those who create the problems that made the call for disintegration robust are the enemies of true federalism.

Those who polluted the Niger Delta, catered away the riches and corrupted our system of government are the enemies of true federalism.

Those who devalued our educational system and sent their children to private schools at home and abroad with stolen wealth are the enemies of true federalism.

Those who politicised revenue allocation methodology and derivative formula, and cornered much of our wealth through the creation of unproductive states and local government councils, are the enemies of true federalism.

Conclusion

This is no longer the time to allow anyone or any political group to undermine our future and misappropriate our resources. This is not the time for a negligible few to appropriate the bulk of our national wealth through shady crude oil deals. We should firmly resolve that never, never, will any individual, a group of individuals or interest groups unilaterally impose a President or a Vice President on the rest of us again. Any member of a political party with a desire to run for the office of the President must be able to participate in the primaries without encumbrances or calculated inhibitions. I do not know what went wrong between President Obasanjo and Vice President Atiku; whatever it was, his treatment, his disqualification, and un-disqualification in the presidential primaries that brought in the late President Yar'Adua was appalling, disgraceful, and a total violation of Atiku's fundamental right to run for electoral office, barring any disqualifying conviction or criminal offence/record. We are better than that. And we must speak up.

Long Live Nigeria and the Good People of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.


Mr. Alex Aidaghese

  Public Statement on the Humanitarian Crisis in Gaza This essay has been motivated by the feedback received earlier today in response to ...