Kwankwaso, the Minister of Works (Eng Dave Umahi), and the Myth of Northern Marginalisation

A few weeks ago, after returning from Benue State, social critic VeryDarkMan (VDM) made an observation that received little attention: the alarming poverty and stark underdevelopment across the state. Benue is not an isolated case; its conditions reflect a broader, more troubling reality across Northern Nigeria.

For decades, the Nigerian military has routinely cited poor road infrastructure as the reason for delayed interventions in communities plagued by banditry and terrorism. These areas, they argue, are often inaccessible. This excuse not only highlights the country’s chronic infrastructure deficit, but also confirms the harsh truth VDM exposed in Benue State.

Many of the roads in question fall under the jurisdiction of state and local governments. This fact, to some extent, absolves the Federal Government from full responsibility. However, it also reveals a deeper irony: the same Northern political leaders who have failed to deliver development at the subnational level are often the loudest voices accusing the federal government of marginalising the North. In truth, their invocation of “Northern interests” serves more as a political bargaining tool than as a genuine concern for the region’s well-being.

No one seems to be holding them accountable for the poverty, illiteracy, and systemic neglect that define many parts of the North. How long must a region remain labelled as “educationally disadvantaged”? How long does it take to train competent teachers? Between 1942 and 1946, Chief Obafemi Awolowo laid the groundwork for the Western Region’s educational transformation, starting with teacher training. Yet, decades later, children in many Northern states consistently perform at the bottom in national examinations.

These outcomes are not due to any biological or inherent deficiency, but are a direct result of failed systems and neglect perpetuated by local leadership - Governors and local government Chairmen. A child capable of imbibing and reciting entire Quranic verses verbatim is capable of solving Quadratic Equations in a Mathematics class if he or she has the opportunity to take the course or subject in a conducive environment. No matter how you look at it, it’s all about effort and the leadership that you have and what their views are on education, equal rights, and egalitarianism.

Contrary to the unfounded accusations that President Tinubu is marginalising the North while prioritising development efforts in the South, available evidence indicates a consistent and balanced approach to national development. For the first time in decades, Nigeria is experiencing a leadership committed to equitable progress across all regions.

The ongoing Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, as well as the Badagry-Sokoto Superhighway, just to name a few, exemplify a strategic commitment to national integration through expansive and inclusive road infrastructure.

From infrastructure projects in the Northeast to agricultural interventions in the North Central, and renewed investment in education and health across the Northwest, the administration has demonstrated a consistent commitment to inclusive governance.

Simultaneously, Southern regions have also witnessed strategic development initiatives, not as a means of favouritism, but as part of a holistic national development plan.

When figures like Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso speak of protecting Northern interests, they often evoke images of populist heroes like Mallam Aminu Kano. However, their rhetoric rarely matches their reality. In practice, they are political aristocrats, disconnected from the masses they claim to defend, governing from the comfort of Abuja or their state capitals while rural communities languish in neglect.

In the 1990s, a revealing article in the now-defunct West Africa magazine cited the Northern chapter of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), noting that Northern states received more education funding than their Southern counterparts. Yet, the impact on the ground was negligible. That same trend persists today.

Fortunately, the current Minister of Works has made public the breakdown of federal road projects across the country, offering much-needed transparency. This mirrors a similar episode during President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration, when some Northern leaders accused the federal government of selling public assets almost exclusively to Southern buyers during the privatisation process.

The narrative gained traction until Professor Ibrahim Ayagi, a respected Northern economist and adviser to the president, revealed that Northern interests had actually acquired 55% of privatised assets, compared to the South’s 45%. That revelation, based on verifiable data, promptly silenced the misinformation. Today, Kwankwaso’s accusations regarding road projects are just as misleading and deserve the same fact-based rebuttal.

The extent of underdevelopment in the North is clear in the aftermath of bandit attacks. Entire communities remain trapped in conditions reminiscent of pre-independence Nigeria. Given the numerical advantage the North holds in terms of states and local governments, a result of the lopsided restructuring under General Sani Abacha, one would expect proportional development outcomes. This is based on the simple truth that more states and local government councils lead to larger shares of federal allocations. Yet, increased allocations from the federation account have done little to improve infrastructure, education, or health care in the North.

Despite these realities, Northern political elites like Kwankwaso continue to flood the airwaves with claims of marginalisation, rarely challenged by their own constituents. These unchecked narratives thrive in an environment of widespread illiteracy and misinformation, further fueling insecurity and national discontent.

Rather than prioritising long-term investment and human capital development, many Northern leaders have embraced a culture of patronage and symbolic gestures like State-funded mass wedding ceremonies, token empowerment schemes, and recycled political slogans. It is time for Nigerian commentators, particularly those from the North, to start asking hard questions of their leaders. Democracy demands accountability, and silence only ensures ongoing failure.

They continue to mobilise underage voters with impunity and even take pride in doing so. Kwankwaso once lampooned President Jonathan, declaring that although he provided education to the Almajiri population, they were used to voting him out of office. On a more disturbing note, if a true population advantage exists, why resort to underage voting? Such actions show a troubling sense of entitlement and a disregard for legal norms and the long-term effects of undermining democratic practices.

When he made that statement (using the Almajiri kids to vote President Jonathan out of office), many Nigerians dismissed it as mere comic relief. Yet, it spoke a profound truth—one that exposes the troubling reality of a nation where justice and the rule of law are applied unequally. While some citizens make genuine efforts to uphold the law, others flout it with impunity, treating compliance not as a civic duty, but as a matter of personal convenience.

This essay is not motivated by or rooted in regional hostility. It is a call to action. Many of these self-styled champions of the North profess egalitarian ideals, but they govern with a feudal mindset. They mobilise underage children to vote and then boast about population size. In 2015, some reportedly recruited militias from the Sahel to influence elections, fearing President Goodluck Jonathan might refuse to step down. If the region truly had the population advantage, why bring in foreign fighters?

We must move beyond these myths. A nation cannot hope for sustainable development when local government chairmen remain in state capitals and governors rarely leave Abuja. This detachment has created a vacuum, one filled increasingly by angry, marginalised youth turning to resentment and violence against the federal government.

The North must confront its contradictions. And Nigeria, as a whole, needs to prioritise facts over fiction, substance over sentiment, and leadership over loud rhetoric.

May God bless our leaders with wisdom, our people with courage, and Nigeria with peace and prosperity.

Barr Alex Ehi Aidaghese

July 26, 2025.

Please, for the record, I am not a blogger - I don't blog or write for a living. I am a legal practitioner and consultant who comments on public affairs only when necessary—to set the record straight or provide a reasoned, objective perspective for policymakers. I hold a Master's degree in the Law of Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law and Policy. My practice focuses on government relations, public policy advisory, regulatory issues, energy, land acquisition, real estate, and property development.

Who is Afraid of Blackness and Black Influence in America? A Reflection on the Neglect of Black Inventors in Historical Narratives

A Synopsis

Who is Intimidated by Blackness and African American Influence in America? This short essay is inspired by a video I watched a few days ago, highlighting the historical neglect of seven Black inventors whose contributions to American greatness remain largely unrecognised or uncelebrated.

It also draws attention to the troubling trend of erasing Black history through the removal of books, images, and educational materials from public institutions across the country.

In the interest of peace and personal security, I have deliberately chosen not to name the institutions and individuals leading the campaign to erase Black history and wage a quiet war against Black identity. However, make no mistake, their actions are calculated and deeply harmful to our shared purpose, national unity, and the hard-won progress achieved through the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

DEI and a Distorted Narrative

There remains a persistent tendency to diminish the creative ingenuity, innate wisdom, and intellectual contributions of Black individuals, often under the guise of critiquing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. 

These criticisms frequently suggest that DEI weakens national identity, greatness, or excellence, while overlooking the historical reality that Black achievement has long been central to America's progress.

Black communities have long demonstrated exceptional contributions to society through architectural and construction prowess, skilled craftsmanship, and entrepreneurial expertise. 

From designing and building enduring structures to establishing thriving businesses against systemic odds, their achievements reflect a legacy of resilience, innovation, and economic independence. 

Yet, these contributions are too often overlooked in mainstream historical narratives, despite their undeniable impact on shaping American cities, institutions, and commerce.

Historical Facts

For instance, the heroics of the Tuskegee Airmen, Black pilots who served with distinction during World War II despite systemic racism, are seldom acknowledged.

Even less frequently mentioned is Black Wall Street in Tulsa, Oklahoma, a thriving economic centre, created by Blacks for Blacks that was violently destroyed in one of the worst acts of racial terrorism in U.S. history.

These omissions prompt a critical question: Who, or what, is truly threatened by the recognition and celebration of Blackness?

Unless you can demonstrate that you outperformed them in combat operations, or that their leadership failures directly contributed to your unit’s defeat, your critique—whether rooted in hostility toward DEI, anti-Black narratives, or deliberate exclusion—lacks sound judgment and any serious foundation in professional military ethics.

Conclusion

Erasing their history, literature, images, and legacies from public institutions and buildings in the U.S. borders on cowardice, racism, and insecurity. Such an approach undermines the principles of nation-building and does not align with the long-term goals of sustainable national development and inclusive governance.

Embracing and celebrating their unique contributions, however seemingly minor, alongside other American patriots and heroes in public spaces and institutions, enriches our nation. And that's the first step towards reinforcing American greatness.

Rethinking State Police in Nigeria

 Rethinking State Police: Is Implementation Realistic in Nigeria? 

Presently, I'm tempted to reconsider my support for state police, particularly after hearing the recent comments from Edo State Governor, Senator Monday Okpebho. The Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, PhD, may be right in his concern that state governors could use this initiative to suppress opposing voices. 

When writers and public affairs commentators advocate for public policies, we often assume that all stakeholders share our level of understanding or intellectual exposure. However, there is a significant gap between the ideals we promote and the practical realities on the ground. A quick look at the behaviour of many public figures shows this disconnect. Their public statements and actions—especially the election-season attacks on former friends and family—are not only disgraceful but also reveal a blatant disregard for decency and intellectual discourse. This behaviour does not show strength; it exposes the moral bankruptcy behind their ambition. 

So, what should be the next step for us as writers and commentators? Should we adjust our approach to engage with the current intellectual and moral realities of today’s leadership, or should we hold firm to our principles and continue speaking the truth, even if it feels like we are doing so in isolation? 

One thing is clear: we are living in a different world, but with clarity, consistency, and conviction, we can still shape the generation of leadership to come. We must therefore tailor our advocacy with a clear understanding of the motivations of the principal actors. At the same time, we must not allow the progress we have made as the most educationally advanced state in Nigeria to be reversed. 

Whether we like it or not, those of us from Edo State are facing the prospect of an unprecedented, mob-style governance for the foreseeable future, in part because of Senator Adams Oshiomhole's political influence. This is a reality we cannot change for now. As we confront these challenges, may God bless the present governor with advisors of integrity, wisdom, and diplomatic humour, rather than gangsters. 

On a final, but crucial, note: there is a difference between a public misstep and unrepentantly maintaining an untenable position of moral righteousness. What well-informed individuals might tolerate as a gaffe could actually be a calculated and intentional act. This troubling trend is something Nigerians—not just those in Edo State—must be prepared to confront over the next four years. 

In conclusion, I believe that the meek and the righteous will always be protected by God. 

Barr Alex Ehi Aidaghese contributed this piece from Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria.

The Case for Sustaining Nigeria's Armoured Truck Program: Reflections on the Retirement of Major General Victor Ezegwu ftom the Nigerian Army

This piece reflects on the recent retirement of Major General Victor Ezugwu, former Director General of the Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria (DICON). While his departure marks the close of an important chapter, it must not signal the end of the remarkable initiative he pioneered: Nigeria’s indigenous armoured truck program.

Together with his team, Major General Ezugwu led the development and production of Nigerian-made armoured vehicles — an achievement that stands as a landmark in our military-industrial history. His story, as reported by Punch newspaper, is both inspiring and cautionary. The mere possibility that this program could be abandoned following his retirement is cause for serious concern.

History offers a powerful lesson. During the Nigerian Civil War, the Biafran army, under immense pressure and blockade, engineered the Ugbunigwe (popularly known as the Ojukwu Bucket), along with other locally produced weapons like rocket-propelled grenades and landmines. These innovations reflected a depth of engineering ingenuity rarely acknowledged. One would have expected the federal government to incorporate these engineers into the Nigerian armed forces post-war. Yet that expertise was discarded.

A nation that demonstrated such technical capability over five decades ago should, by now, be a hub for indigenous weapons manufacturing, especially given the difficulties President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration faced in procuring arms abroad during the war against Boko Haram. Instead, we remain reliant on foreign suppliers, often paying exorbitantly for equipment that we could build ourselves.

Following the collapse of President Shehu Shagari’s administration, the Nigerian military became preoccupied with political power rather than professional development. That neglect left us unprepared for the insurgencies that later ravaged the North East. If we had invested in local research, manufacturing, and engineering, we might not have found ourselves so vulnerable.

General Ezugwu’s armoured truck program offered a course correction. If one locally built armoured vehicle costs approximately ₦250 million—compared to ₦900 million to ₦1 billion for an imported one—then the financial benefits are self-evident. Beyond cost savings, local production strengthens national security, reduces dependency, and creates jobs across related industries—steel, chassis manufacturing, logistics, and maintenance services. This is precisely how countries like Turkey, India, and Pakistan built self-reliant military-industrial complexes.

Yet the threat of discontinuing this initiative looms large, largely due to entrenched interests in foreign procurement deals, which remain lucrative for influential defence contractors. If constitutional age limits or tenure rules mandated General Ezugwu’s retirement, so be it; however, he should be immediately re-engaged in a civilian capacity to continue leading this critical initiative. His expertise is not only valuable; it is irreplaceable at this stage.

Nigeria has an opportunity to emerge as a leader in armoured vehicle production for developing countries, particularly across West and Central Africa. Why shouldn’t we be exporting defence equipment rather than importing it? Why dismantle progress instead of institutionalising it?

A critical obstacle to sustained military development lies in the misuse of the Federal Character and Quota System in recruitment and promotion. While inclusiveness is important, it must not come at the expense of merit and competence. National defence requires the best minds and the highest standards. We must balance diversity with excellence to build a modern, effective fighting force.

With visionary leadership and continuity, we can replicate the models of Singapore and South Korea—nations that turned scarcity into strength. But this begins with decisions like the one before us: to preserve and expand a homegrown military innovation program that has already proven its worth.

So the question remains: Why retire the vision with the man? Why not empower him further to train a new generation of military engineers, meet our internal security needs, and drive an industrial revolution in defence manufacturing?

This is not just about armoured trucks. It is about national dignity, self-reliance, and economic transformation.

Mr. Alex Aidaghese is currently on an extended visit to Nigeria. He is the managing partner at Alex & Partners, a boutique law practice and consultancy firm with offices in Lagos and Port Harcourt. Mr. Aidaghese holds a Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law and Policy. He may be contacted via text at +243 807 762 0672 or by email at ehilexander@gmail.com.

Leadership and the Price of Disconnect: A Case Study of Former President Buhari

A leader's effectiveness is intrinsically linked to the competence of their team. In governance, admirable personal virtues must translate into tangible institutional performance and positive public impact. This is precisely where former President Muhammadu Buhari's administration ultimately fell short.

One of the most perplexing decisions of his administration, beyond overlooking key individuals who helped secure his presidential victory and failing to leverage their wisdom in forming his government, was his choice to retain nearly 90% of his original cabinet members and advisors in his second term. This occurred despite overwhelming evidence of underperformance from many ministers, even as the "Talakawa" (the poor Northerners who formed his strongest support base) grew increasingly disillusioned.

Consider the egregious example of the school feeding program scandal. A minister allegedly spent billions during the COVID-19 lockdown, a period when children were clearly not attending school. The justification for this expenditure defied logic, yet no accountability or indictment followed. This incident was a microcosm of a larger problem: an administration where good intentions were undermined by poor execution and unchecked loyalty.

Many of Buhari’s close associates, both before and during his funeral, still attest to his personal honesty, integrity, and selflessness. I do not dispute this, and I believe most Nigerians share this view. But in the same breath, not one of these loyalists can convincingly explain how those virtues translated into tangible improvements in the lives of the millions of Talakawa who adored him. His administration became a paradox: a "clean" president presiding over a system that increasingly appeared corrupt, incompetent, or indifferent.

The socioeconomic consequences were stark. More Northern youths are now found in the farms and jungles of the South, desperate for daily sustenance, than before the Buhari administration. Indeed, he had a strong affinity for the poor, but he was, first and foremost, quintessentially an aristocrat.

Furthermore, without adequate explanation—whether socioeconomic or religious—he failed to fund and sustain the over 600 educational institutions built by his predecessor for the Almajiri population. This oversight is particularly striking given that all his adult children received their professional degrees from universities in England, indicating his clear understanding of the value of education. I mention his children's educational journey not with malicious intent, but rather to underscore that the former president recognised the importance of education.

The disconnect ran even deeper. During his first term, Buhari made multiple medical trips to Europe. Yet, under his direct purview, the Aso Rock Clinic, allocated billions of naira annually, allegedly lacked basic medications like Panadol. Nigerians would have remained unaware of this glaring deficiency had his wife, Aisha Buhari, not courageously expressed her frustration publicly. Her revelation exposed a significant absence of internal accountability within the presidency. Was anyone indicted or fired? No.

Even in national security, an area where Buhari was expected to lead decisively, questionable contracts were awarded. A young defense contractor from the Niger Republic reportedly received millions of dollars and pounds to supply weapons to the Nigerian Armed Forces, only to flee to Niamey without fulfilling his contract. When he was declared wanted by the EFCC, he publicly challenged them through his lawyer, questioning why he was declared wanted if they knew his location. The case is still being litigated.

Buhari may have meant well, and he may have been sincere. However, sincerity, when coupled with poor judgment in personnel and a weak grip on governance, is insufficient to effectively lead a nation of over 250 million people. Was he even aware of the dire state of our university education and the helplessness of his Ministers of Education and Labour, that Nigerian students were spending an average of seven years for a four-year degree program?

Leadership demands results, and results are delivered by capable, disciplined teams. If his most trusted subordinates and lieutenants failed the people, then ultimately, President Buhari failed those who loved and believed in him the most. After all, the buck stopped with him.

The Path Forward for the Current Administration

This brings us to the present administration. As I stated at the launch of NELFUND, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu must learn from these past mistakes of President Buhari. There is an urgent need for a Monitoring Czar—a high-level, empowered official supported by a small team that constantly travels between federal projects, Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs), and local government councils. This team must inspect project sites, review financial records, assess compliance with regulatory issues, and ensure that campaign promises are translated into tangible deliverables, not waiting for a crime to be committed or embezzlement of public funds to be reported.

Furthermore, members of the National Assembly are not protected by the immunity provisions enumerated under Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution as amended. Similarly, constituency projects are not immune from public scrutiny or investigation.

The urgency of such oversight becomes even clearer when considering reports that state governors are now earning significantly more from the Federation Account than during Buhari’s administration. Without robust monitoring, funds are wasted, projects stall, and the populace suffers.

A clear example of this persistent dysfunction is the ongoing situation along the Koko–Ologbo axis of the Benin–Sapele Road. Despite the Sapele to Benin City side of the highway being newly tarred, the road remains inexplicably closed to public use. Travellers are forced to endure long hours navigating swampy terrain and passing through the congested Ologbo village, all due to bureaucratic delays or a lack of oversight. This is precisely the kind of problem a well-functioning monitoring structure would swiftly resolve.

To be fair, not every member of Buhari’s administration was a failure. Former Transportation Minister Rotimi Amaechi deserves commendation for his significant achievements in the railway sector. His efforts stood out in an otherwise underwhelming cabinet. Above all, I must not fail to applaud the departing President for the amazing job he did at the Second Niger Bridge—it's a landmark worthy of celebration.

Anyway, the broader lesson remains: a leader's good character is meaningless if it does not lead to improved lives for citizens. Buhari’s failure wasn’t simply that he didn’t steal, but that he failed to build a team capable of delivering on the promises made. The Talakawa who believed in him, prayed for him, and voted for him en masse expected more, and they deserved better.

The price of this disconnect was eight years of missed opportunities. The present administration cannot afford to repeat the same mistake.

Barr Alex Ehi Aidaghese is the Principal Partner at Alex & Partners (Legal Practice and Consultancy), 

Lagos, Nigeria. 

July 21, 2025

Rethinking Foreign Aid: Western Influence and Africa's Path to Peace and Proseperity

July 19, 2025

1. Introduction

The U.S. Senate’s recent approval of the White House request to rescind $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding has sparked debate in both political and humanitarian circles. While I sympathise with the mission and staff of institutions like PBS and NPR, this decision should serve as a wake-up call, especially for leaders in conflict-ridden nations across Africa, South America, and the Middle East.

Hunger, displacement, and underdevelopment in regions such as South Sudan, the Sahel, Northern Nigeria, Yemen, and parts of East Africa are not simply the result of resource scarcity. These crises are symptoms of deeper political and governance failures. Many of these nations are not inherently poor; they are resource-rich and home to educated populations capable of driving development. Yet corruption, nepotism, terrorism, insecurity linked to illegal mining, and political exclusion have stalled progress and entrenched authoritarian rule.

Egypt offers an instructive example. Since the Arab Spring and the fall of a Western-backed dictatorship, the country has witnessed more infrastructure development in a single decade than in the preceding half-century. This illustrates a sobering reality: when foreign involvement strengthens undemocratic regimes or undermines local accountability, it often prolongs stagnation rather than alleviating it.

2. Institutional Transparency or Ideological Interference

It is time for the West to rethink its approach. If the United States is not engaged in ideological warfare with China or Russia over their political systems, which diverge sharply from Western democratic capitalism, why impose rigid democratic or economic models on developing nations for championing communist or socialist principles?

Democracy is not a one-size-fits-all export, nor should economic cooperation hinge on the adoption of Western cultural norms or political structures.

Consider Burkina Faso, where Captain Ibrahim Traoré has emphasised national sovereignty and local control over resources. Rather than seeking to isolate or pressure such governments, the international community should offer support through technical assistance, anti-corruption partnerships, and legal capacity-building, not ideological coercion.

In this context, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) stands out as a model worth emulating. By prohibiting American companies from offering or accepting bribes abroad, it reinforces global ethical standards and promotes good governance without imposing ideological mandates.

Few cases better illustrate the global nature of corruption than the Halliburton/KBR bribery scandal. KBR, then a Halliburton subsidiary, paid over $6 billion in bribes to secure the Bonny Island Liquefied Natural Gas Project in Nigeria. In the U.S., executives were prosecuted, and even former Vice President Dick Cheney faced legal scrutiny and financial penalties. Yet to this day, no Nigerian officials involved in the scandal have been publicly named or prosecuted.

A similar story unfolded with former U.S. Congressman William Jefferson, who was sentenced to 13 years in prison for facilitating bribes in telecommunications deals involving top officials in Nigeria, Ghana, and other African nations. While Jefferson was held accountable under U.S. law, his African collaborators were never indicted or publicly identified. (Source: U.S. Department of Justice.)

These cases highlight a troubling double standard: foreign actors are increasingly held accountable under the FCPA, while domestic actors in Africa frequently evade scrutiny. This lack of accountability fosters impunity, weakens institutions, and undermines public trust in democracy.

Foreign aid, when given, must therefore be tied not to ideology but to transparency, legal reform, and institutional strengthening. African nations need independent judiciaries, professional civil services, and ethical leadership, not foreign lectures on social policy.

On that note, the perception that U.S. aid comes with conditions related to LGBT rights has sparked resistance in several African societies. These issues, while important, are often viewed as culturally insensitive and politically coercive, pushing countries toward alternatives like Chinese state-backed firms that promise “no interference.”

3. Africa’s Strategic Shift Toward China: What the West Must Do

The shift toward Chinese multinationals, often dismissed as “debt-trap diplomacy,” reflects a larger strategic dilemma. Many African governments, frustrated by Western aid’s ideological strings, are turning to Chinese infrastructure deals that appear less intrusive but pose significant long-term risks.

A major concern lies in the “stabilisation clauses” embedded in these contracts, which limit a country’s ability to update laws on labour, environment, or investment. Host governments often lack the legal and technical capacity to negotiate such terms effectively, leaving them bound to unfavourable obligations for decades.

Examples abound: Chinese control over infrastructure in the Republic of Congo, Kenya’s Mombasa Port, Uganda’s Entebbe Airport, and key assets in Zambia and Djibouti point to a troubling pattern of opaque deals and limited oversight.

In contrast, while American and European companies have their flaws, they typically operate under more transparent legal and governance frameworks. 

To counter this growing dependency and protect African sovereignty, Western engagement must pivot from ideological conditionality to practical capacity-building. Aid should focus on strengthening legal systems, procurement transparency, and institutional reform, not exporting Western political or social models.

The drawdown in U.S. foreign aid may, ironically, be an opportunity, if it prompts African governments to invest in self-reliance and accountability. But this will only succeed if African leaders reject identity politics and cronyism in favour of competence, integrity, and a genuine respect for the rule of law and independent judiciary.

The West, for its part, must confront its own legacy. For decades, it supported authoritarian regimes across Africa for geopolitical convenience—romanticising leaders like Mobutu Sese Seko of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, who presided over economic stagnation, while vilifying Muammar Gaddafi, under whose rule Libya became one of Africa’s most developed nation-states.

If the West hopes to regain credibility, it must pledge total abstinence from sponsoring coups, manipulating elections, or undermining democratic processes in Africa. Development must not be dictated from Washington or Brussels. It must be locally led, strategically supported, and shielded from both foreign manipulation and internal corruption.

Africa’s path forward must be its own, rooted in the continent’s unique realities and informed by its own aspirations, not imposed by outside powers.

4. Elevating the Conversation on the U.S. FCPA of 1977.

An Overview

"The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 15 U.S.C. ("FCPA"), was enacted to make it unlawful for certain classes of persons and entities to make payments to foreign government officials to assist in obtaining or retaining business. - Criminal Division, US Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/criminal/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-practices-act.

Unfortunately, few African scholars or policy commentators fully appreciate the relevance and potential of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). More public education is needed to highlight its role as a transparent, ethical alternative to the convoluted foreign investment deals, particularly those offered by Eastern powers. The FCPA helps combat corruption without ideological imposition and aligns more closely with Africa’s long-term interests.

As writers and public thinkers, we must take up the responsibility of informing the public. On moral and governance grounds, America has far more to offer Africa than polarising cultural debates. It is time we elevate the conversation beyond identity politics and celebrate the FCPA for what it truly is: a legal tool for accountability, transparency, and ethical investment.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) isn’t just about regulating American companies. It’s a gold standard for ethical business, and a model African nations should know and demand.

5. The Drogba Doctrine: A New Model for Peacebuilding

During Côte d’Ivoire’s civil war (2002–2007), a moment of unlikely leadership emerged, not from politicians or diplomats, but from a footballer. Didier Drogba, the Ivorian striker and national icon, changed the course of history not with weapons, but with a match and a plea. 

October 08, 2005, following Côte d'Ivoire's 3-1 victory over Sudan, securing their qualification for the 2006 FIFA World Cup, Didier Drogba and his teammates participated in an extraordinary act in the locker room. 

In an impromptu moment captured by a television crew, Drogba and the entire team knelt down in the dressing room. Drogba then delivered an emotional plea, speaking directly to the warring factions: 

“Men and women of Ivory Coast, from the north, south, centre, and west, we proved today that all Ivorians can co-exist and play together with a shared aim — to qualify for the World Cup. We promised you that the celebration would unite the people — today we beg you, on our knees: forgive, forgive, forgive. One country in Africa with so many riches must not descend into war like this. Please, lay down your weapons, and hold elections.” 

His heartfelt message, coming from a national hero at the peak of his football fame, had an astonishing effect on the warring factions, the New Forces Movement, led by Guillaume Soro. Within a week, a ceasefire was declared. While it didn’t end the conflict entirely, the gesture was widely credited with shifting the national mood and demonstrating the unifying power of sport.

Also in 2007, Drogba requested that a key African Cup of Nations 2008 qualifier against the Madagascar national team be played not in the capital, Abidjan, but in Bouaké, then a rebel stronghold. His request was granted. The match, played on neutral ground, symbolised national reconciliation and helped pave the way for a ceasefire, thus succeeding where international interventions had failed for five years.

Drogba’s power came not from politics, but from trust and cultural connection. In a continent where over 60% of the population is under 30, cultural figures like musicians and athletes often carry more influence than generals or presidents.

Why not harness that influence?

6. A Call to the African Union For A New Start.

How long must we continue to look to Washington, DC, Paris, or Kiev to learn a lesson on how to foster a sense of brotherhood with our fellow Africans? It is time to look inward. We had Didier Drogba advocating for peace through song, and Quincy Jones and his team singing "We Are the World" to support the forgotten thousands in Ethiopia and Somalia, and indeed, they made a profound impact and brought solace to humanity. And to all the bandits in Northern Nigeria and the warlords in the Sahel, heed the soul of Michael Jackson, heed Drogba's words: we are the world, the human race; lay down your arms and let us celebrate our shared humanity, rather than engaging in conflict that benefits no one.

It is time for the African Union to embrace what we might call the Drogba Doctrine—actively engaging cultural and music icons, athletes, and respected public figures in peacebuilding across the continent. These individuals can speak to disillusioned youth, demobilise fighters, and promote unity in ways suits and speeches cannot.

If a footballer’s heartfelt message could end a war, surely we can replicate that model. Peace needs both power and persuasion—both leadership and inspiration.

As the U.S. reconsiders foreign aid, the focus must shift from transactional funding and ideological demands to long-term investment in African capacity, leadership, and accountability. That includes support for independent institutions and for the voices that truly move the people. Because at the end of the day, African youth don’t want war. They want to live. To laugh. To celebrate life.

Let’s give them more reasons to sing, hope, live,  dream big dreams, cherish the moment, be an accomplished person, a role model, rather than to fight and die for gunrunners and illegal miners. 

Barr Alex Aidaghese Esq is the Principal Partner at Alex & Partners (Legal Practice and Consultancy), Lagos, Nigeria. He holds a Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law and Policy. He can be reached via text at +234 807 762 0672 or by email at ehilexander@gmail.com

July 19, 2025.

USAID versus Incinerator: What Would Jesus Christ Have Done

It is one thing to withhold charitable giving due to a lack of resources, but it is entirely another to refuse to give when one has an abundance. 

This is precisely what makes the closure of USAID and the expiration of undelivered grains and food supplies an egregious crime against humanity and ungodly in every sense.

This represents a grave injustice and an affront to human dignity. It is worth asking how the American Christian Evangelical Right reconciles such an image with its professed values, especially in light of its unwavering support for the President.

If these actions had been condemned by Jesus Christ, then silence in the face of President Trump’s decision to abolish USAID, while surplus grain meant for the world’s most vulnerable is destroyed, is profoundly at odds with Christian teaching.

True leadership is elevated by compassion. How can one witness this without experiencing a deep sense of moral revulsion?

Is it possible that the President’s advisors, allies, and confidants are so detached from the human cost of this policy that they fail to see its cruelty or lack the conviction to call for its reversal?

And is the President himself unaware of the implications, assuming no one in his circle is conscientious enough to point out the moral and practical absurdity of this course of action?

One can only hope that the Norwegian Nobel Committee is paying attention.

When Hostility Becomes a Congressional Hobby: The Wisdom in Atonement

There’s something almost magical—an opaque, self-defeating spell—about how some Republicans and their most devoted voters defy not just logic and empathy, but even basic self-preservation and common sense.

You’d think the surest way to win votes would be to help people live longer, healthier, and safer lives. But no. These voters seem most inspired by lawmakers who couldn’t care less if they can afford Panadol or keep the heat on in winter.

It brings to mind an old African proverb: A boy throws a stick into a crowded market and ends up hitting his own Mama. In this case, the boy's name is “Congressman,” and Mama just lost her Medicaid.

The more viciously some Republican lawmakers attack popular programs such as food assistance, healthcare, and anything with the word public in it, the more beloved they become. It’s as if voters are auditioning for roles in their own downfall.

Who else would reject “Obamacare” on camera without knowing what it even includes? A Republican voter, who simply couldn't reconcile the words "Obama" and "care."

Look at GOP primaries: hostility isn’t just tolerated, it’s rewarded. Compassion is out; cruelty polls better. A politician who dares to suggest that poor people deserve dignity is quickly branded a socialist and a threat to the free market. And in today’s conservative landscape, nothing is more unforgivable than empathy. Remember "Obamacare."

Take Medicaid expansion for example; it’s been rejected in multiple red states, even though it would cover hundreds of thousands of uninsured constituents. In other words, who needs healthcare when you have slogans?

Ironically, the Affordable Care Act—vilified as socialist—was first piloted by a Republican governor in Massachusetts. Yet Republicans in Congress have tried to repeal it dozens of times, as if stripping millions of people of coverage were a patriotic sport or a badge of honour. And somehow, this is the party of family values.

The crueller the policy, the louder the applause. It’s political Stockholm Syndrome:
“Yes, take away my healthcare! Crush that student loan forgiveness proposal! Dismantle the Department of Education! Burn the expired grains! Let the unharvested crops and fruits rot in the fields, we’re just fine with shortages and inflation!”

Then, out of nowhere, comes Senator Josh Hawley, calling for “atonement” and espousing “deliverance,” proposing a rollback of some of the very Medicaid cuts his party once championed, as reported by The New York Times. It’s... shocking. A plot twist no one saw coming.

To borrow from biblical language: he seems to have seen the light—not the God of the Christian evangelical right, but the God of the "Talakawas" (the working poor). Maybe in the form of polling numbers. Or perhaps in the rumble of the turbulent storms and the roar of floods —nature’s unfiltered commentary on unchecked policy negligence.

Whatever the reason, may his atonement be contagious, shining all the way to the House Freedom Caucus. And may someone gently inform voters that compassion is not socialism or a communist manifesto, but simply a policy approach that doesn’t actively hurt you.

As we pray for his deliverance to deliver the vote, let us also hope this rare flash of moral clarity doesn’t dissipate under the weight of party orthodoxy, peer pressure, or Fox News.
AMEN.

July 16, 2025

Senator Josh Hawley: A Moment of Divine Revelation

 Senator, there appears to be a self-defeating paradox at play, wherein certain Republicans and their devoted constituents defy not only logic and empathy but also basic self-preservation and common sense.

One would assume that the most effective way to garner votes would be to support policies that enable people to lead longer, healthier, and safer lives. However, these voters seem to be most inspired by lawmakers who demonstrate a callous disregard for their well-being, particularly about affordable healthcare and basic necessities.

This phenomenon is reminiscent of an old African proverb: A boy throws a stick into a crowded market and ends up hitting his own mother. In this context, the boy's actions can be likened to those of certain Republican lawmakers, who, in their efforts to dismantle social programs, ultimately harm their own constituents.

The more aggressively some Republican lawmakers attack popular programs – such as food assistance, healthcare, and public services – the more admiration they receive from their constituents. This trend suggests that voters are, in effect, advocating for policies that are detrimental to their own interests.

A notable example of this phenomenon is the rejection of "Obamacare" by some Republican voters, who oppose the policy without fully understanding its implications, such as coverage for pre-existing illness. Their opposition seems to be driven primarily by the association with former President Obama, rather than a genuine concern for the policy's content.

An examination of GOP primaries reveals that hostility and aggression are not only tolerated but also rewarded. Compassion and empathy, on the other hand, are viewed as liabilities. Politicians who dare to suggest that vulnerable populations deserve dignity and support are quickly labelled as socialist threats to the free market.

For instance, Medicaid expansion has been rejected in multiple red states, even though it would provide healthcare coverage to hundreds of thousands of uninsured constituents. This decision prioritises ideological slogans over the well-being of citizens.

Furthermore, the Affordable Healthcare Act-referenced earlier in this which was initially implemented by a Republican governor in Massachusetts, has been repeatedly targeted for repeal by Republican lawmakers. This effort to strip millions of people of healthcare coverage has become a badge of honour for some, despite the harm it would cause to families and communities.

Ironically, the party that claims to champion family values is, in fact, advocating for policies that would harm the very families they purport to support.

The more severe the policy, the louder the applause. This phenomenon can be likened to a form of political Stockholm Syndrome, wherein voters seem to be complicit in their own downfall.

However, in a surprising turn of events, Senator Josh Hawley has embraced "atonement" and deliverance from ideological extremism, proposing a rollback of some of the very Medicaid cuts his party once championed, as reported by The New York Times. This development is shocking, to say the least.

To employ biblical language, it appears that Senator Hawley has experienced a moment of divine revelation, wherein he has recognised the harm caused by his party's policies and is now seeking redemption and deliverance.

Whatever the motivation behind Senator Hawley's change of heart, one can only hope that his atonement will be contagious, inspiring others to follow suit. Voters must recognise that compassion and empathy are not synonymous with socialism or communism, but are, in fact, essential components of a humane and effective public policy.

As we await the outcome of Senator Hawley's proposal, let us hope that his moment of clarity will not be fleeting and that it will inspire a more compassionate and empathetic approach to policymaking. Voters must demand more from their elected officials and recognise that policies should be designed to support and uplift, rather than harm and exploit.

USAID OR INCINERATOR

What would Alfred Nobel have done? And What Would Jesus Christ Have Done?

This represents a grave injustice and an affront to human dignity. 

True leadership is elevated by compassion. How can one witness this without experiencing a deep sense of moral revulsion?

Is it possible that the President’s advisors, allies, and confidants are so detached from the human cost of this policy that they fail to see its cruelty or lack the conviction to call for its reversal?

And is the President himself unaware of the implications, assuming no one in his circle is conscientious enough to point out the moral and practical absurdity of this course of action?

One can only hope that the Norwegian Nobel Committee is paying attention.

Tariffs Manifesto for Dummies

Similar to the now-infamous "healthcare plan for dummies," the controversy surrounding tariffs has devolved into another exercise in political posturing. Beneath the bravado lies no genuine strategy—only a fixation on headlines and a desire to dominate the news cycle. What is conspicuously absent, once again, is a thoughtful plan to improve the economy or raise the standard of living for everyday Americans.

Tariffs are not political weapons. They are intricate economic instruments designed to regulate trade imbalances, protect strategic industries, and foster fair competition in the global marketplace. When misapplied as tools for political retaliation, they distort markets, sow uncertainty, and often end up harming the very economies they claim to defend.

For instance, what significant changes occurred in the trade, socioeconomic, or diplomatic relationship between the United States and Brazil, either a month ago or even a week ago, that could justify President Donald Trump’s recent decision to increase tariffs on Brazilian goods? The answer is nothing substantial. The only notable development is Brazil’s hosting of the 2025 BRICS Summit, other than the criminal prosecution of the former president's corrupt enrichment.

This move appears to have triggered a reaction rooted in political grandstanding rather than any clear economic rationale. It is a gesture devoid of strategic value and lacking any measurable benefit to American industry or consumers.

If the earlier Wall Street, American farmers, and foreign trade-related investors realise there is no economic plan, the better for Americans. Heads of state and leaders of governments overseas are already aware of the absence of a coherent plan from Washington, D.C.

His tariff rhetoric treats complex trade dynamics as if they can be solved with a tweet, an executive order, or a press conference. This shallow approach undermines global trust, disrupts supply chains, and inflates costs for consumers and producers alike. Both Americans and the international community feel the ripple effects. When has the imposition or elimination of tariffs become the subject of riddles and jokes? 

Presently, it is impossible for anyone to definitively state the current trade policy or tariff regime between the United States and countries such as China, Canada, and Mexico. The rules have undergone numerous changes, particularly within the past 100 days, rendering effective planning a significant challenge for affected nations and investors. 

This heightened level of unpredictability is fostering an environment of economic instability at home and increasingly bears resemblance to tacit market manipulation, which appears to favour speculators and stockbrokers at the expense of long-term policy consistency and global trust.

The world, specifically Americans, cannot afford a major economy operating without a reliable and credible trade compass. As global challenges, from inflation to climate-linked disruptions, mount, international trade demands coordination and foresight. And trade policy must be grounded in data, long-term planning, and mutual benefit, as opposed to the prevailing ego or electoral theatrics.

In conclusion, whether in Washington, Lagos, Brussels, or Beijing, citizens and institutions must insist on evidence-based economic leadership. America must demand clarity. Demand competence. And above all, demand that President Donald Trump and his seemingly overtly subservient advisers—subservient, at least, for now—treat global trade as a serious lever of policy, not a stage for political drama. 

July 13, 2025

 When Hostility Becomes a Congressional Hobby: The Wisdom in Atonement

There appears to be a self-defeating paradox at play, wherein certain Republicans and their devoted constituents defy not only logic and empathy but also basic self-preservation and common sense.

One would assume that the most effective way to garner votes would be to support policies that enable people to lead longer, healthier, and safer lives. However, these voters seem to be most inspired by lawmakers who demonstrate a callous disregard for their well-being, particularly with regards to affordable healthcare and basic necessities.

This phenomenon is reminiscent of an old African proverb: A boy throws a stick into a crowded market and ends up hitting his own mother. In this context, the boy's actions can be likened to those of certain Republican lawmakers, who, in their efforts to dismantle social programs, ultimately harm their own constituents.

The more aggressively some Republican lawmakers attack popular programs – such as food assistance, healthcare, and public services – the more admiration they receive from their constituents. This trend suggests that voters are, in effect, advocating for policies that are detrimental to their own interests.

A notable example of this phenomenon is the rejection of "Obamacare" by some Republican voters, who oppose the policy without fully understanding its implications. Their opposition seems to be driven primarily by the association with former President Obama, rather than a genuine concern for the policy's content.

An examination of GOP primaries reveals that hostility and aggression are not only tolerated but also rewarded. Compassion and empathy, on the other hand, are viewed as liabilities. Politicians who dare to suggest that vulnerable populations deserve dignity and support are quickly labeled as socialist threats to the free market.

For instance, Medicaid expansion has been rejected in multiple red states, despite the fact that it would provide healthcare coverage to hundreds of thousands of uninsured constituents. This decision prioritizes ideological slogans over the well-being of citizens.

Furthermore, the Affordable Healthcare Act, which was initially implemented by a Republican governor in Massachusetts, has been repeatedly targeted for repeal by Republican lawmakers. This effort to strip millions of people of healthcare coverage has become a badge of honor for some, despite the harm it would cause to families and communities.

It is ironic that the party that claims to champion family values is, in fact, advocating for policies that would harm the very families they purport to support.

The more severe the policy, the louder the applause. This phenomenon can be likened to a form of political Stockholm Syndrome, wherein voters seem to be complicit in their own demise.

However, in a surprising turn of events, Senator Josh Hawley has called for "atonement" and "deliverance," proposing a rollback of some of the very Medicaid cuts his party once championed, as reported by The New York Times. This development is shocking, to say the least.

To employ biblical language, it appears that Senator Hawley has experienced a moment of divine revelation, wherein he has recognized the harm caused by his party's policies and is now seeking redemption.

Whatever the motivation behind Senator Hawley's change of heart, one can only hope that his atonement will be contagious, inspiring others to follow suit. It is essential that voters recognize that compassion and empathy are not synonymous with socialism or communism but are, in fact, essential components of a humane and effective policy.

As we await the outcome of Senator Hawley's proposal, let us hope that his moment of clarity will not be fleeting and that it will inspire a more compassionate and empathetic approach to policymaking. It is crucial that voters demand more from their elected officials and recognize that policies should be designed to support and uplift, rather than harm and exploit.

Stabilising Nigerian Universities: A Political Strategy for Economic Revolution. July 04, 2025

Preamble.

What if fixing the university academic calendar could help fix the economy? It’s not just possible; it’s already happening, albeit unnoticeably.

In Nigeria, discussions about economic growth often focus on oil, foreign investment, or monetary policy. But there’s another force at play — quiet, steady, and often overlooked: the stabilisation of our university academic calendar. I've consistently focused on this topic in the past year.

It might seem like a minor administrative achievement, but ensuring Nigerian universities remain open, predictable, and on schedule could be one of the most impactful economic policies of the decade. Each time I am asked what President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu has recently done for us, my immediate citation-one among many-has always been the stabilisation of our academic calendar and university education in Nigeria. And we are only beginning to see the results.

When Degrees Take Seven Years

Until recently, a four-year university programme in Nigeria could take as long as seven years to complete. Endless ASUU strikes and funding disputes pushed thousands of students and their frustrated parents to seek alternatives abroad, regardless of the cost.

The result is obvious. Capital flight. Parents sold Naira, bought dollars or pounds, and sent the money out of the country to pay school fees overseas. Few realise the strain this has placed on the Naira.

When thousands of families rush to exchange Naira for foreign currency each year, not for investment or import purposes, but simply to escape our broken education system, they create unnecessary pressure on the currency. The result: a steady, avoidable depreciation of the Naira.

Black Market Demand and Unforced Depreciation

Here’s the key point: most of this demand for foreign exchange isn’t generated by businesses seeking to grow the economy. It’s from individuals trying to secure education abroad. And because they are desperate, they’re willing to buy foreign currency at any rate. Maybe you want to read the paragraph above again, because it is at the heart of this essay.

This behaviour distorts the foreign exchange market. It’s not driven by trade or investment; it’s emotional, reactive, and harmful. The Naira gets battered unnecessarily. But that has changed.

In recent months, there has been an unprecedented calm in the university system. No strikes. No mass disruptions. Just steady and uninterrupted academic activity. Slowly, pressure on the Naira has begun to ease.

Savings and Liquidity

When students can graduate on time at home, parents stop sending their children abroad out of desperation. This reduces demand for dollars and pounds, allowing more Naira to stay in the country. Savings increase.

That money, now retained domestically, doesn’t just sit idle. It gets used to start businesses, build homes, pay for local services, or fund other children’s education within Nigeria. In other words, it starts working for the Nigerian economy instead of elsewhere.

The impact is profound. Within the country, we now see more liquidity, more investment, and more employment opportunities.

Reversing the Brain Drain

In the past, families from neighbouring countries like Cameroon sent their children to Nigeria for higher education. In the United States, I have met many graduates from UNN and OAU who came from across the border. This trend has reversed in the past 20 years. We are now the ones sending students abroad to Ghana, Uganda, Togo, South Africa, and even offshore campuses of Western universities in Africa.

Stability in the academic calendar can change that. With a reliable academic calendar and improved quality, we can restore Nigeria’s reputation as an educational hub, attracting students (and their tuition fees) back into the country.

Training for Export the Right Way!

Nigeria already exports one of its most valuable resources: skilled professionals, particularly in healthcare. Our nurses and doctors are in high demand globally, and their remittances support families and businesses back home.

However, to sustain this pipeline, students must graduate on time. Delays disrupt career paths, migration plans, and family expectations. Academic stability ensures a steady flow of qualified professionals who can work here or abroad, sending money back home to fuel the local economy.

Let’s be clear: we’re not glorifying the “Japa” trend. We’re advocating for structured, intentional investment in education so Nigeria can become a respected exporter of human capital, much like India has with its tech professionals.

One Policy, Many Benefits

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration may not receive much recognition for this, but stabilising the academic calendar addresses more problems than it appears to. It (1) reduces capital flight, (2) eases pressure on the Naira, (3) boosts domestic investment, and (4) ensures a steady supply of graduates for both local and international employment.

This isn’t about politics. I am not writing to promote a campaign agenda. My analysis stems from my background in management and public administration, based on observable facts and economic reasoning.

Conclusion

In economics, we often say: If A leads to B, and B leads to C, then maintaining A will eventually produce C. In this case, stabilising university education in Nigeria by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu (A) results in less capital flight (B) and ultimately a stronger economy and currency (C).

We are only at the beginning of this journey; however, the signs are promising. If this trend continues, Nigeria could emerge with a stronger Naira, more jobs, and a better reputation, not just for its oil or entertainment, but for its people and its education. And that is a future worth investing in.

In closing, I want to reiterate: Leadership should be assessed not only on past grievances, but also on current intentions and future outcomes. Let us give President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and his team a fair chance to deliver on their promises while remaining vigilant and committed to constructive engagement.

They are not merely governing within the limits of available human and material resources; they are pushing boundaries, reinventing resilience, and optimising the process.

The often reviled, but tolerated, culture of low expectations does not define them. That's become history. What is evolving is more than conventional governance. This is a complete reset, heralding not just the remaking of a broken system, but a total replacement.

May God bless you, and may God bless Nigeria. 🇳🇬

July 04, 2025

Undaunted, He Wrote.

Dr. Bukola Saraki's ascent to Senate President during the 8th National Assembly (2015–2019) was, essentially, a carefully planned civilian coup executed within the National Assembly against Chief Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Central to this plot was a deliberate attempt to weaken Chief Asiwaju and diminish his influence and relevance in the new administration he nurtured and helped bring to fruition.

A vital question remains: Where did the instruction originate that directed certain lawmakers to proceed to the National Assembly for the decisive vote? All evidence suggests it came from Aso Villa.

However, to this day, the identity of the person who issued or authorised that call remains unknown. Significantly, the senators excluded from this process or phone call were all members of the APC loyal to Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who were prepared to vote for his preferred candidate as the Senate President, instead of Dr. Saraki for the role.

This manoeuvre was part of a broader strategy to politically sideline Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu within the very government he helped install — President Buhari's administration.

One might have thought that, considering his enormous sacrifices that propelled Gen Buhari into the Presidency, President Buhari and his close-knit inner circle would have handed the APC Presidential ticket to him effortlessly. But no, they wanted him out, humiliated. Unfazed, he fought back. To this day, only God knows how he did it - defeating the presidential machinery with a single strike.

A similar crude scheming pattern re-emerged during the last PDP presidential primaries, leading to the controversial defeat of Governor Nyesom Wike. The Sokoto man he trusted the most pulled the rug from under him, resulting in a crash. Even though he rose from the fall, he seems not to have forgotten how he fell and those responsible.

These two fighters didn't resolve to nurse their wounds in seclusion, defeated; rather, they are actively disrupting the status quo, undeterred. They feel no moral lapses in taking the fight to their tormentors' comfort zones, simultaneously pulling all strings to reinvent the federal government for the good of our future generations.

And what could be worse than changing the national currency on the eve of presidential campaigning and election, then failing to make the currency available months after the change? As a result, many vulnerable Nigerians died in the process, while the targeted victim, overcoming all the odds, soldiered on to victory undaunted.

Today, for the first time in Nigeria’s political history, a pro-people administration occupies the centre stage. Yet, ironically, many seem reluctant to grant them even three full years in office. It prompts the question: When was the last time Nigerian universities completed two consecutive academic years without disruption?

Leadership should be assessed not only on past grievances but also on current intentions and future outcomes. Let us give Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu and his team a fair chance to deliver on their promises while remaining vigilant and committed to constructive engagement.

They are not merely governing within the limits of available human and material resources; they are pushing boundaries, reinventing resilience, and optimising the process.

A culture of low expectations does not define them. This is more than conventional governance. This is a complete reset, heralding not just the remaking of a broken system, but a total replacement.

Consequently, tough times can only be alleviated, but hardly eradicated, during a sudden disruption. Thus, being patient becomes unavoidable.

Barr Alex Ehi Aidaghese

July 03, 2025